The Ethical Obligations of a Court-Appointed Guardian ad Litem as Opposed to the Obligations held by a Court-Appointed Attorney
For all intents and purposes, an attorney appointed by the court to represent a party is in an attorney-client relationship with the party and bound by the rules of professional conduct On the other hand, an attorney appointed as a Guardian ad Litem (“GAL”) answers to the court, and represents the ward’s best interest, not their wishes The GAL does not enjoy an attorney-client relationship with the ward and owes no duty of confidentiality except when the GAL is involved in a privileged matter “A guardian ad litem is not a party to an action, but merely the representative of record of a party” Estate of Cochems, 110 Cal App 2d 27, 29 (1952) The appointment of a GAL can be under Section 372 of the Code of Civil Procedure or Section 1003 of the California Probate Code When a... more